Every question.
Every objection.
Every comparison.

Prompito is a Chrome extension that operates as a complete AI output quality layer on top of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. It works in three phases.

Phase 1, Enhancement: Before you send, Prompito analyses your prompt, identifies what professional best practices say is missing, and rewrites it. You insert the enhanced version with one click.

Phase 2, Detection: After you send, Prompito monitors the page automatically and tells you when the AI has finished responding. No action needed from you.

Phase 3, Evaluation: Prompito reads the AI's response, compares it to your requirements point by point, and tells you specifically what was delivered and what was missed, with a ready-to-send correction prompt if anything fell short.

That complete loop, better input, verified output, immediate correction path, is what separates Prompito from every other tool in this space. No other tool closes the loop. They stop at Phase 1.

Prompito uses the Claude API to power its enhancement and evaluation engine. It is purpose-built quality infrastructure, not a general-purpose AI chatbot.

The AI you talk to in ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini is your working AI. Prompito's job is to make sure what goes in is excellent and what comes out is verified. Think of it as a specialist colleague who reviews your brief before you send it and audits the first draft when it arrives back.

Nothing changes. Prompito appears as a floating bubble on whichever AI platform you're already using. You work in ChatGPT or Claude or Gemini exactly as you do now. Prompito does its job and stays out of your way the rest of the time.

No tab switching. No copy-pasting. No new platform to learn. The first time you use Prompito it takes about two minutes to feel natural.

Re-reading is what you do now, casually, subjectively, with your attention on the content rather than the completeness. Output verification is what Prompito does systematically.

Prompito checks the AI's response against the specific requirements in your enhanced prompt: Did it use the tone you specified? Did it hit the length target? Did it include the CTA you asked for? Did it address the audience you defined? It checks each requirement, names precisely what's missing, and generates a targeted correction prompt.

The difference is the same as re-reading a contract versus having a lawyer check it against the brief. One is better than nothing. The other catches what the first never would, especially on long outputs, complex prompts, or your tenth review of the day when your attention has drifted.

Every other prompt enhancer starts from your prompt and tries to make it better. Clearer. More structured. Less vague. That produces a better prompt than you started with, but it's still just polishing what you gave it.

Prompito was designed to understand what a great output looks like. That's why the recommendations it surfaces are specific to your use case, not generic quality observations, but the precise requirements that stand between your current prompt and a professional-grade result.

The difference shows up immediately. Other tools tell you your prompt could be clearer. Prompito tells you your email is missing a defined next action, or your proposal doesn't address the reader's likely objection, or your report opens with process instead of conclusions. Specific. Consequential. Actionable.

That's because Prompito focuses on optimizing your output by design, not just enhancing at the prompt level. The prompt is the means. The output is what matters. Every recommendation traces back to that.

And then, after the AI responds, Prompito checks whether the output actually got there. Not whether the response reads well. Whether it delivered what was required. If something fell short, Prompito names it precisely and gives you a correction prompt targeting exactly what's missing.

Most tools optimize for the feeling of a better prompt. Prompito optimizes for the quality of the actual output. Those are not the same goal.

It does, though that's a side effect, not the pitch.

Every gap Prompito identifies comes with a plain-language explanation of why it matters, not just what's missing. Over time, users who pay attention to those explanations naturally start writing stronger prompts on their own. The gaps get smaller. The corrections get fewer.

No other tool in this space is designed to do that. Most are designed to keep you dependent on the tool. Prompito is designed to improve your actual output, and if that makes you a more effective AI user in the process, that's the right outcome.

We deeply want to serve the professionals who need high-quality AI output most, marketers sending proposals to clients, legal professionals drafting correspondence, HR teams writing policy, healthcare communicators producing patient-facing content, consultants billing for AI-assisted deliverables. These are serious people doing serious work that warrants serious quality infrastructure.

So we made the paid plans genuinely, deliberately affordable. $69 a year is $5.75 a month, less than a single coffee. Every new user gets 5 full cycles completely free with no credit card required, no countdown timer, so you can experience the complete quality loop before spending a single dollar.

Here's what traditional prompt enhancers won't tell you about their free tiers: free forever is not funded by generosity, it's funded by paying customers. When a competitor offers unlimited free usage, their paid subscribers are subsidising the infrastructure for everyone who never pays. Their paying customers are being charged more so that free riders can use the product indefinitely.

Prompito doesn't do that. We charge serious professionals a price that respects their time. Free riders don't get to do it on their backs.

One cycle = one complete quality loop: prompt enhancement plus output evaluation. Every cycle has a real compute cost, which is why we use a cycle model rather than unlimited.

Tools that promise unlimited usage are making one of three bets: they're not doing serious AI processing per request, they're quietly throttling heavy users, or they're betting most users won't use it much. We don't make bets against our own users.

200 cycles a month is 6–7 complete quality loops every working day. If you're doing more than that, the Teams plan at $99 per seat exists precisely for you, and at that volume, the time savings pay for it many times over.

You always see your exact cycle count. No hidden throttling. No fine print. No surprises.

Yes, the economics work because Prompito was engineered from day one with cost discipline. Lean infrastructure, usage limits that reflect real compute costs rather than marketing ambitions, and a pricing model designed around sustainability from the start.

$69 a year is deliberately the easiest possible purchasing decision for a professional. The moment a consultant saves one revision cycle with a client, or a marketer avoids one round of amends on a campaign, Prompito has paid for itself for the year. We'd rather have 10,000 users who see that value clearly than 1,000 who resent paying $200.

Yes. We offer a 7-day refund on new Pro Monthly and Pro Annual subscriptions. Email support@prompito.com within 7 days of your payment with your order details.

We'd rather earn your confidence through the 5 free cycles first. By the time you upgrade, you should already know whether it works. If you're still not sure after five full loops, the refund is there.

Pretty Prompt is a well-built tool with a loyal user base. Their one-click enhancement is fast and their no-login setup makes it frictionless to try. They've grown to tens of thousands of users by doing one thing simply. We respect that.

But here's the precise definition of what Pretty Prompt is: a prompt improver. It takes your rough idea and rewrites it into a cleaner prompt. Phase 1 only. What happens after you send that prompt, whether the AI actually delivered what you asked for, whether the CTA was included, whether the tone was right, whether the length was hit, is entirely on you to figure out by yourself.

Prompt Genie markets a feature they call a "Prompt Evaluator." This name matters, because it sounds exactly like what Prompito does, and it is not the same thing at all.

Prompt Genie's evaluator gives you feedback on your prompt before you send it. It scores the quality of your input. That is still Phase 1, it has nothing to do with the AI's actual response. It's still asking "is this prompt good?" rather than "did the AI deliver what this prompt asked for?"

Prompito's Phase 3 evaluation reads the AI's output after it's generated and checks it against your specific requirements. That is a categorically different operation. Prompt Genie does not do this. No traditional prompt enhancer does this.

They can build it. The question is what it costs them when they do. The answer is: it would break their pricing model entirely.

Pretty Prompt's paid plan offers unlimited prompt enhancement. That promise works at their current scope. The moment they add output evaluation, their per-user economics change fundamentally. They would need to restructure their entire pricing, break their core promise to existing customers, and rebuild significant infrastructure to do what Prompito already does.

Prompito was designed from day one to handle the full quality loop. The pricing, the cycle model, the infrastructure — everything was built knowing we'd be doing the complete job, not just the first half. That's not a feature you bolt on. It's a ground-up architectural decision.

They'll get there eventually. But they'll have to break a lot of promises to their existing users to do it.

It proves they built a great prompt enhancer and an excellent distribution machine. Genuinely, growing to that size is hard and we respect what they've built.

But ratings measure satisfaction with what a product does. They don't measure what a product doesn't do. No user has ever given Pretty Prompt 3 stars because it didn't verify the AI's output, because they never expected it to. They didn't know it was possible. That's the category gap Prompito fills.

The question isn't "is Pretty Prompt good at being a prompt enhancer?" It clearly is. The question is "does enhancing the prompt alone solve the full problem professionals face?" It clearly doesn't. The second half of every AI interaction, did the response actually deliver?, is still on you. That's the half Prompito owns.

No. Prompito checks whether the AI delivered what your prompt asked for, not whether what it said is true. If your enhanced prompt specified a 150-word email with a specific CTA in conversational tone, Prompito checks those requirements. It does not check whether the statistics are accurate, whether the claims are defensible, or whether the advice is professionally sound.

Factual verification requires domain expertise that no automated tool can replicate. You are always the final reviewer. Prompito makes that review faster and more structured, it does not replace your professional judgement.

Prompt enhancement works for all request types. Output evaluation, Phase 3, is skipped for image generation, code generation, and mathematical calculations. These outputs require domain-specific technical validation that goes beyond text alignment checking. When evaluation is skipped, no cycle is deducted.

Prompito is purpose-built for professionals producing written, communications-based outputs: emails, reports, proposals, social content, legal correspondence, HR communications, blog posts. That's where systematic output verification delivers the highest practical value, and where the gaps found by Phase 3 have the most professional consequence.

No. Prompito v1 is not HIPAA compliant and must not be used with Protected Health Information. No Business Associate Agreement is in place. Healthcare professionals must use Prompito only with fully de-identified content, not patient names, diagnoses, case details, medications, or any PHI.

A HIPAA-compliant enterprise tier is on the roadmap. Until it is explicitly released and labelled as such, the prohibition applies without exception. This is documented in our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, we take it seriously.

Worth noting: Prompito's privacy warning system does flag prompts that appear to contain sensitive data combinations, giving professionals a chance to remove or mask information before sending. That's a useful safety net. It's not a compliance certification.

Prompito is a Chrome extension for desktop. It requires Google Chrome on a desktop or laptop computer. It does not work on Safari, Firefox, Edge, or mobile browsers.

This is the reality of Chrome extension architecture, and also the reality of where serious AI-assisted professional work happens. The emails sent to clients, the proposals drafted for review, the reports submitted for approval, these are overwhelmingly produced on desktop environments. That's where Prompito lives, and where it delivers value.

Your prompts and AI outputs pass through Prompito's servers during processing, that's necessary for the enhancement and evaluation to happen. They are processed in memory and discarded immediately after. They are never written to a database, never logged, never stored.

What we store: your account metadata, name, email, plan status, cycle count, industry profile selection. That's it. The content of every prompt and every AI response is gone the moment the request completes.

No. Prompito does not sell, rent, share, or trade personal data with any third party for any commercial purpose. We are a subscription business, not an advertising business. Our revenue comes from users who pay for the quality loop, not from monetising their data.

The content generated while using Prompito, prompts, outputs, enhancement results, is never stored by us. It cannot be sold by anyone because it doesn't exist in our systems after your request completes.

Prompito scans your prompt before processing and flags combinations that indicate sensitive information, a patient name with medical context, a client name with case details, financial account data with personal identifiers.

When detected, a warning appears before your enhanced prompt is shown, giving you the chance to remove or mask sensitive information before it's sent to the AI platform.

This warning is about output risk, the AI's response may reproduce, reference, or expand on sensitive data you entered. The warning is not about Prompito's own data handling. We never store the flagged content. A boolean (flagged: yes or no), a timestamp, and a general use case type are recorded. Nothing else.

Prompito delivers the highest value when the quality of your AI output has real professional consequences. Specifically:

• Marketing managers and consultants producing AI-assisted content that goes to clients or gets published, where gaps create rework, revision rounds, and credibility risk
• Legal professionals using AI for correspondence, document drafting, and research summaries, where precision, completeness, and tone are non-negotiable
• HR professionals writing policy communications, job descriptions, and sensitive employee correspondence, where missed requirements and wrong tone have real organisational consequences
• Healthcare communicators producing patient-facing or clinical content with strict accuracy and compliance requirements
• Teams where multiple people use AI daily and consistent quality across outputs matters

The common thread: you put your name on the AI's output. Prompito makes sure what comes out actually deserves it.

We'd rather be honest about this than waste anyone's time, including yours.

• Casual AI users using ChatGPT or Claude a few times a week for quick questions or light brainstorming, the quality loop is more structure than they need
• Developers and engineers primarily generating code, enhancement works, but evaluation is designed for written professional content, not code review
• Image generation users, prompt enhancement works, but output evaluation is skipped for images
• Mobile-first users, Prompito requires desktop Chrome

If you're not certain whether Prompito is right for you, use the 5 free cycles with no card required. You'll know within the first two complete loops whether the quality layer adds genuine value to your workflow.

Fair challenge. If you're already a skilled prompt writer, Phase 1 will feel less revelatory, though you'll still get tighter, more professional-standard rewrites with fewer gaps than even an expert typically writes under time pressure.

But here's the real question: do you also systematically verify the AI's output after it responds? Not casually re-read it, systematically check it against specific requirements?

Most professionals, even skilled prompt writers, make a subjective judgment on the output. Prompito checks it against criteria. These are different operations, and the second catches things the first misses, particularly on complex prompts with multiple requirements, or on your tenth output review of the day when your concentration has drifted.

Expertise is the floor. Systematic verification is the ceiling.